Re: Magyar uveg <-> Romanian uiag&

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...>
wrote:

>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "altamix" <alxmoeller@> wrote:
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > 1)-reducing the geminate ( uw= uu=u),
>
> This is Not true for Romanian : vaduwa was maintained
> (See Old Romanian /v&duwa/ > v&duva)

these are separat syllable, there is no gemination there !!!!
va-du-va, ma-du-va

>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > 2) yotacising of "e" to "ie"
>
> This is Not true either.
> The transformation e>ye/ya is ended "End Of Roman Period"

What does makes you to think that way. This change of "e" to "ie" and
then to "ia" will work even today, where is the problem?

>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > 3) rendering of "ie" to "ia" due the "ã" in the next syllable
>
> > *uwega > *uega > *uiegã > uiagã
>
> Not applicable based on 1) and 2)
>
> Marius
>

well, not. It really works:-)


Alex