[tied] Djilas (Re: /�vaeg/ > /u-'ya-g&/)

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott" <BMScott@...> wrote:

>
> At 8:42:44 PM on Wednesday, April 23, 2008, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
>
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Brian M. Scott"
> > <BMScott@> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> You missed the point completely. In a Latinizing context
> >> in which other names are given Latin forms, this one
> >> isn't, even though the <Julian(us)> is. I could say more,
> >> but George has already said more than that.
>
> > Brian, It's you that you didn't understand.
>
> No, it isn't. Learn something about medieval onomastics.
>
> Brian
>

Brian, yu > gj is an Albanoid transformation.

Iulius/Iulianus > *Gjulya- > Gjulla => is regular

(if the Loan is Old Enough as Is suspected to be)


Some rules for you and George:
==============================
PAlb: Old Timeframe lw > ll , ly > ll

A More Recent timeframe (for loans): ly > l'y > y

Marius