From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 57777
Date: 2008-04-21
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr GasiorowskiObviously irrelevant even if true.
> <gpiotr@...> wrote:
>> On 2008-04-20 13:44, kishore patnaik wrote:
>>> You are a linguist. How can you judge the dating aspect
>>> as crank when the dating is done by scientists of
>>> yesteryears?
>> I _can_ question the reasoning that leads to such
>> datings. It has precious little to do with science,
>> whether social or natural, but everything to do with
>> arbitrary interpretation and wishful thinking.
> There is nothing particulary scientific about linguistic
> methods of dating either.