From: Richard Wordingham
Message: 57729
Date: 2008-04-20
> Piotr is, of course, correct that the word cannot be derived from*dheugh-;
> it is, in fact, derived from *dheug(h)-, which does not appear inPokorny
> although we are fortunate to have an English cognate: 'dug', meaning'animal
> teat'.What series of loans do you propose for English _dug_? It can't be