From: mkelkar2003
Message: 57665
Date: 2008-04-19
>Non-academic policy of this list which is limited to discussion of
>
> --- Kishore patnaik <kishorepatnaik09@...>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I think it is time we maintain some decorum on this
> > group and ban
> > all non academic issues such as abusing others,
> > discussing
> > personalities, questioning the credentials and so
> > on.
> >
> > Let us assume that I post on dating on MBh, saying
> > that the event
> > has occured in 3000 bce, there is not a single post
> > that logically
> > discusses the acceppted main stream thoughts - no
> > one even discusses
> > the language and dating of composition of MBh (which
> > is obviously
> > much much later to the event itself!)
> >
> > Similarly, there is a huge difference between the
> > original Mbh
> > (called Jayam) and the Mbh of today's version,
> > compiled mostly by
> > Ugrasravas,a bard of probably south India. However,
> > linguistically,
> > there is no post discussing the difference.
> >
> > Instead of writing nonsensical rebuttals, which will
> > not take us
> > anywhere, I expect academic rebuttals, which
> > certainly require some
> > kind of patience and hard work on the part of the
> > linguists here. I
> > crave such obligations from my friends here.
> >
> > i am appalled.
> >
> > Kishore patnaik
> >
> If you write something claiming the Mahabharata was
> written 3.000 BCE, then you're guilty of violating the
> non-academic policy --
> postulating such an idea is irrational blind faith.When you make such statments as a linguists you are in fact assuming
> It's like the science of the tooth fairy, nothing to
> it. So lets us be appalled when you violate the rules
> of common sense.
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>