From: george knysh
Message: 57630
Date: 2008-04-18
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh****GK: We only know of these early Marcomanni via
> <gknysh@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
> >
> > > Come to think about it, Marius' proposal might
> even be possible.
> > > The geminate -nn- in -manni and the connection
> with the ancestor
> > > Mannus means the Marcomanni were of the same
> kind as eg. the
> > > Chatti, ie. a displaced NWBlock people. But that
> means we should
> > > not expect k -> x -> h in the name, cf Chatti,
> in the first
> > > sources called Catti (and remember that this is
> the mark of the
> > > NWBlock, that it had no Grimm-shift). So in such
> a language we
> > > would have *marko- "horse". That also fits with
> Caesar's
> > > description that the Germani used a very new
> tactic of pairing men
> > > of infantry and of cavalry in pairs (he doesn't
> specifically
> > > single out the Marcomanni), so "horsemen" would
> make sense.
> >
> > GK: And the "Suebi" would be the infantrymen
> > (:=)))??
>
>
> No, the whole thing would be a Marcomanni regimen
> which Ariovistus
> might have let extend to the other peoples of his
> army.
>****GK: What isn't? (:=))) Very little... I prefer not
> Sorry to have been so disloyal to you in this feud
> ;-) ,
> but with the changes I propose it is possible.
> Marius' proposal, as it****GK: And practically speaking, that's what
> stands, won't fly, it would lead to a Germanic
> language with both
> *marxa- "horse" and *marko- "horse"; such a state
> wouldn't last long.
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>
> Torsten
>
>
>