From: Patrick Ryan
Message: 57615
Date: 2008-04-18
----- Original Message -----
From: "stlatos" <stlatos@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 12:41 AM
Subject: [tied] Salt (was: Not "catching the wind " , or, what ARE we
discussing?)
--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Rick McCallister <gabaroo6958@...> wrote:
>
>
> --- stlatos <stlatos@...> wrote:
>
> > --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "tgpedersen"
> > <tgpedersen@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > > - - - - - - - -
> > > > > How do you then derive Gmc. *sal-t- from IE
> > *sh2el-?
<snip>
What are you asking? Just because I don't think the d in salt is
the same as in that (*tod) doesn't mean I think anything different
than what I first said: d in the noun came from d in the adj.
(sxaLdo+) which is formed with stative *do+ as in Latin adj. in -idus
(as I've discussed before with some people here).
***
Patrick:
I certainly do not think that *-do is a stative.
***