From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 57573
Date: 2008-04-17
> To show you that 'Marcomani' is no so 'Transparent' as Piotr and"The same" as what? The Celtic names with <Marco-> of course contain the
> George try to assert here without any argument here please read black
> and white :
>
> "The same element marc- is attested in local Gaulish names, such as
> Mrco-durum 'horse gate'(?) Marcomagus 'Horse-valley' (DAG 221)
> Marco-lica 'horse-stone (? Spain; Delammare 2003:217) Compare the
> Gaulish proper names Marcomarus, Marcosena, Marcomani, Marcus
> (?, the king's name in the Tristan Legend). Consider Ambio-Marcis
> (dat. pl) a "Matronen-name" (Schmidt 1957:123), mat be relevant here"
> So I showed to you all who is "the silly" here that makes "superiorDeclaring them NORMAL RIGHT in block capitals doesn't strengthen your
> remmarks talking about the transparency of Marcomanni meaning"...
>
> AS you can see There ARE OTHERS THAT PUT ALSO THIS WORD IN A NORMAL
> RIGHT SERIES : "Compare the Gaulish proper names Marcomarus,
> Marcosena, Marcomani, Marcus"
> and don't talk:Again, misrepresenting what I said, and repeating the same silly thing
>
> about "o- of marco as a Latinized Process"
>
> supposed to transform "all the Daco-Celtic-Germanic marco- names in
> the same time from a supposed a- to o-"