From: Patrick Ryan
Message: 57529
Date: 2008-04-17
----- Original Message -----
From: "kishore patnaik" <kishorepatnaik09@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 6:30 AM
Subject: Re: Re: [tied] More by Bryant
> ****
>
> Patrick:
>
> We have been requested to do this.
***
Patrick:
The request was to head each of our comments with our names so that the
reader can more easily follow the argument.
There is no conspiracy.
You are talking here, are you not?
***
>
> ***
> *
> **
> *requested by who>?n why?? I know that there is a deep conspiracy to
> shut
> me up , to look at my every word, to blow up mixes up as a big fault... *
> **
> *It is not easy for vested interests to quell the revolution of truth,
> howmuchever strong and power ful they are. *
> **
> *YOu have acceeded to the request and your role as the puppet on key chain
> (
> i am sorry to use the phrase but that is how it looks like, i thot
> scholars
> have an independent mind)is over. Let me take over and unearth who has
> requested you to create a big hue and cry over this. And why. *
> **
> *Is it because what i say holds truth> the dangerous truth that may prove
> the final waterloo for the western models of subjective linguistics and
> shirnking chrnological historiography??? *
> **
> *I am appalled but then, I guess it is me who said Indian historiographic
> scene is highly polemicized.*
> **
> *Kishore patnaik
> *
>