Re: Not "catching the wind " , or, what ARE we discussing?

----- Original Message -----
From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 7:49 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re:Re: [tied] Re: Not "catching the wind " , or, what ARE
we discussing?


>
> >> =========
> >> It was *kuH1on?
> >>
> >> Hence zero grade kH1wn > k^wn.
> >> It's a fourth example of kH1w > k^w.
> >>
> >> Arnaud
> >> ========
> > ***
> >
> > Patrick:
> > > There is no 'laryngeal' in this word.
> > > It is analyzed as *k^e-, 'gray' + -w-, 'wolf/predator' + -n- 'thing'.
> > >
> > ***
>
> Gray is one of the other examples.
> gh_H1_s = k^_s
> Laryngeal again.
>
> Arnaud
> ==========

***

Patrick:

'gray' is analyzed *g^he-, 'bare' *H, STATIVE + -*re-, 'color' + *-*y,
'like'

Kudos. Got one almost right!


***