From: george knysh
Message: 57174
Date: 2008-04-12
>****GK: Why would that culture not have been in
> > GK: Sorry, Torsten,but this won't do. You're
> > retreating into generalities. The question "Why
> > Przeworsk?", rather than, say, Gubin Yastorf, has
> not
> > been answered. And the relationship between
> "Berig's
> > people" and "Przeworsk" even less.
>
> Like this:
> After Ariovistus' defeat, some of the upper layer
> went northeast to
> Jastorf and influenced that culture to become Elbe
> Germani.
> went to Denmark and Southern Scandinavia from where****GK: At the moment that's just a verbal assertion
> Berig, as part of
> that layer, went to the southern coast of the
> Baltic.
> That takes some proving.
>****GK: BTW AF has sent me a defence of his "Asiatic
> BTW, if we assume the Gothic language came about
> that way we might see
> Gothic as language not inflenced by Verner, but with
> loans that are
> (fulgins etc), instead of the traditional view that
> Gothic was
> influenced by Verner, but later regularized
> paradigms.
>__________________________________________________
>