From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 57143
Date: 2008-04-11
>>> Belsen seems to have been Bellenhusen too.No, that's modern <Bellingroth> recorded in 1280 as
>>> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belsen_%28Bergen%29
>>> No further explanation of the first element.
>> Probably some masculine name, either with a weak genitive
>> or with the suffix <-ing>, but I'd hate to guess which of
>> the many possibilities, having run into <Bellinghoven>
>> (from <Baldo> or <Beldo>, <Belheim> (from <Ballo>), and
>> <Bellingroth> (<Belkinrode> 1280).
> Is that *Bellingroth > Belkinrode, or?