From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 56792
Date: 2008-04-05
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "david_russell_watson"[...]
> <liberty@...> wrote:
>> By the way last night I came across another etymology for
>> Varuna, from 'The American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-
>> European Roots':
>> wel-ยน. To see. 1. Suffixed zero-grade form *wl-id- in
>> Germanic *wlituz, appearance, in Old Norse litr,
>> appearance, color, dye, akin to the source of LITMUS. 2.
>> Suffixed form *wel-uno- perhaps in Sanskrit Varuna,
>> "seer, wise one", sovereign god: VARUNA. [Pok. 1. uel-
>> 1136.]
> But there's something even odder in your American HeritageThe American Heritage Dictionary of Indo-European Roots,
> Dictionary etymology. The quote (copied above) you
> reproduced in your message is *not* from the current
> online version of Calvert Watkins' IE roots index at
> http://www.bartleby.com/61/IEroots.html
> Where is it from?
> Is this entry from an older version of Watkins' index ofA more extensive version.
> IE roots, or what?
> Moreover, I am puzzled by the fact that the entry,If at least some of the material in an entry, or the root
> supposedly written by Watkins, you quote in your message
> directs to Pokorny's entry <*u_el-1> 'to see', whose link
> is given by me above, and which doesn't mention at all a
> "suffixed form *wel-uno-" (= *u_el-uno).
> What a mess! *Who* is exactly the proponent of thisWatkins apparently supports it, but there's no way to tell
> etymology for the name Varun.a?