Re: Mitanni and Matsya

At 1:39:59 AM on Friday, April 4, 2008, david_russell_watson
wrote:

[...]

> Well then you don't understand PIE as well as you think,
> for there's not a thing wrong with *wer-una- from the well
> attested Vedic root vr- and the well attested Vedic suffix
> -una-.

I don't pretend to know much of anything about Sanskrit;
does it have any identifiable semantic content?

Brian