From: Patrick Ryan
Message: 56517
Date: 2008-04-03
----- Original Message -----
From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 8:26 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: [tied] RE: Laryngo delendum est
> ***
> You may not realize it, but there are a few other people on the list who
> might appreciate my efforts.
> =========
> I hope so.
> Arnaud
> =========
> I write for them since you seem to fully understand nothing of what I
> write.
> ======
> I undertand
> but I think most of it is absurd or irrelevant.
> Arnaud
> =========
> The tone in xiu-4 is due to the -*s from the truncated reduplication; and
> if
> Baltic had the metathesis, also, so what? The PIE form reflects the stem
> un-metathesized.
> =======
> We don't need an extra hypothesis like truncated and reduplication
> (which are not evidenced in PIE in this fashinon)
> Because *syewH1 is enough to account for 100% of Chinese forms.
> Arnaud
> ========
***
Oh, so now you know more than Baxter, who proposed *syiw(k)s-.
I hope you set that teacher straight!
***
> I have pointed out why I do not believe the word has been borrowed by ST;
> that would be teaching your grandmother to suck eggs! Ridiculous prima
> facie.
> One can lead a Frenchman to water but cannot make him drink. Natürlich! Er
> trinkt nur Wein.
> ===========
> I suppose this is not ok with Cybalist.Rules.
> I hope Moderators will remind you that.
> Arnaud
> =========
***
After your gratuitous insults to everyone on the list, I cannot think a
small joke will receive capital punishment.
No sense of humor, hein?
Patrick
***
> Your analysis is not confirmed by any of these data.
> Too bad, too sad.
> Patrick
> ***
>
> A considerable amount of words related to clothing
> and sewing has been borrowed from PIE into Chinese.
> I will make a communication about this in June.
> I'll tell you more after that.
> Arnaud
>
> ==============
>
>
>
>
>
>
>