From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 56252
Date: 2008-03-30
> From: "Miguel Carrasquer Vidal" <miguelc@...>*mah2- (or if you prefer, *meh2-). According to Watkins,
>> In fact, cf. *meh2- in e.g. Lat. ma:turus. It can't be
>> *h1 or *h3, which are lost in Hittite in this position
>> (*h1 is lost in *any* position).
> *ma:-, 'mature' is *maH-
> *me:-, 'measure', is *meH-.*meh1-
> Two different, _unrelated_ words!Indeed. So?