From: tgpedersen
Message: 56024
Date: 2008-03-27
>from Hubert: The Greatness and Decline of the Celts
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh <gknysh@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- tgpedersen <tgpedersen@> wrote:
> >
> > > must be a place where some *Teuri- once lived.
> > > >
> > > > GK: Not necessarily "north of the Sudetes" . It
> > > > may indicate that the "Teuri-homers" came from
> > > > wherever the Teuri-home was, not that the Teuri-home
> > > > was north of the Sudetan range where they were placed
> > > > by Ptolemy. They could have been (by 160 CE)
> > > > Germanized elements pushed from the old Tauriscan
> > > > haunts south of the Danube by Burebista. They could
> > > > have come from elsewhere also.
> > >
> > > No, they came from somewhere where 'Teuri' used to
> > > live.
>
> > Which was not necessarily where the Norican Taurisci were.****
>
> Aha. So there was another Teuri- people around. Which was it?
>
> Here's an interesting fact: One of Ariovistus' wives was a Sueuan.
> The other one was a Norican, in other words a Tauriska, sent by
> their king Vocio, apparently for dynastic reasons. Caesar could be
> pleased that no offspring survived of that union.
>
>
> > > Boio-haim- is the former home of the non-Germanic Boii.
> > > Teurio-chaim- must therefore be the home of the non-Germanic
> > > Teuri, not of the Germanic Turingi.
> >
> > ****GK: That's the logic.*****
>
> Yes.
>
> > > > > I was wondering if the indirectly documented *Teuri- in
> > > > > the Czech lands might possibly be the same people as the
> > > > > Taurisci in Carinthia? If so, those Taurisci were the
> > > > > nearest Celtic people to Latènicize Przeworsk.
> > > >