From: jouppe
Message: 56018
Date: 2008-03-27
>Linguistics is not about "I don't think". Its about science.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: jouppe
>
> *mün,ä- `with (after, behind)' (Mk me-l'ä 'later, after that, then')
> (Mk me-ki 'back, again, backwards')
> ============
> I looked for "with" as meaning
> I don't think a real word can be "with, after and behind"
> at the same time.
>
> I disagree with -n- becoming -k-.....
>
> Arnaud
> ==========
>This particular word is well researched and has a complete
> *üli `over, above' (Mk vel'f 'beyond; through, by, over above'
> Mk vel'd'ä 'through, by')
> ========
> This is a good joke.
> ü becoming ve !!