From: tgpedersen
Message: 55650
Date: 2008-03-22
>I could add another Germanic etymology: OLG turn, MLG torn, Late ON
>
> --- tgpedersen <tgpedersen@...> wrote:
>
>
> >
> > I just noticed that since Czarnetski thinks it might
> > be either of
> > Slavic descent, referring to Rospond, or Germanic
> > descent, referring
> > to Rymut and Warchol/ and the source you cite claims
> > it must be
> > Slavic, referring to the authority of Rospond, I
> > would be grateful if
> > you might quote relevant passages from the two other
> > sources too?
> >
> >
> > Torsten
>
> ****GK: There are alternate etymologies in the Wiki
> "Torun" article. Have a look. I suspect that the
> Germanic etymologies all have to do with the town
> founded in 1233. This is possible because we don't
> apparently know the name of the Slavic/Polish
> settlement which existed there from ca. 600 CE. So the
> German etymologies argue for the original German
> source of the 1233 "Thorn" and the Polish etymologies
> try to figure out what this "Thorn" might have been in
> the period 600-1233. But it may have been called by an
> entirely different name then! In any case, none of
> this really matters for your thesis, because there
> seems to have been no settlement there of any sort
> between ca. 400 BCE and ca. 600 CE. So anyone
> "starting out" from that spot (if they did which is
> more than wholly doubtful) in the 1rst c. BCE would
> hardly call themselves after a name which did not
> arise (certainly) for another 1300 years or (possibly)
> for another 650 or so...****