Re: dhuga:ter

Miguel is not a cheat - only a little elusive at times.

To read Martinet is not necessarily to believe him.


Patrick

----- Original Message -----
From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2008 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [tied] Re: dhuga:ter


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
>
> >>You have proved your case as far as I am concerned.
> >
> >I wouldn't be surprised if it was precisely senex ~ senem
> >what led Martinet to look into the matter of laryngeal
> >hardening in the first place.
> >Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> >
> >=======================
> >
> >So, you did not read Martinet.
>
> I *have* read Martinet, of course.
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
>
> =======================
> Mister Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
>
> You are supposed to be
> a reliable serious IE expert.
> You claim you read Martinet
> and you wrote "I wouldn't be surprised..."
>
> I have to contradict you once again,
> No, this is not true,
> it's obvious you did not read him,
> or if you made some perfunctory
> paper-moving leafing-about
> you have not *really* read anything
> Martinet wrote.
>
> Martinet repeatedly wrote
> his point of view in at least
> 3 to 4 books or journals,
> always writing the same,
> which you obviously know not.
>
> Stop cheating.
> I won't believe you
> and I suppose I'm not alone.
> You're making a fool of yourself.
>
> Arnaud
>
> =========
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>