From: fournet.arnaud
Message: 55568
Date: 2008-03-20
----- Original Message -----
From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
>>You have proved your case as far as I am concerned.
>
>I wouldn't be surprised if it was precisely senex ~ senem
>what led Martinet to look into the matter of laryngeal
>hardening in the first place.
>Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
>
>=======================
>
>So, you did not read Martinet.
I *have* read Martinet, of course.
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
=======================
Mister Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
You are supposed to be
a reliable serious IE expert.
You claim you read Martinet
and you wrote "I wouldn't be surprised..."
I have to contradict you once again,
No, this is not true,
it's obvious you did not read him,
or if you made some perfunctory
paper-moving leafing-about
you have not *really* read anything
Martinet wrote.
Martinet repeatedly wrote
his point of view in at least
3 to 4 books or journals,
always writing the same,
which you obviously know not.
Stop cheating.
I won't believe you
and I suppose I'm not alone.
You're making a fool of yourself.
Arnaud
=========