Re: Re[3]: [tied] Latin -idus as from dH- too

Arnaud seems also to be fine at cooking -- his own goose.

Patrick

----- Original Message -----
From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 5:48 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Re[3]: [tied] Latin -idus as from dH- too


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> >
> >You have not provided the slighest
> >beginning of an explanation for
> >Latin iecur and Skrt yakr
>
> I _have_ explained it.
>
> ===========
>
> In which message ?
>
> Arnaud
> =============
>
>
> >>***dhe:ghom does not exist
> >>Anatolian is ambiguous and does not
> >>permit to contrast any e from e:
> >>As you have repeatedly explained
> >>but failed to understand what it entails
> >>for your theory.
> >
> >As I have repeatedly explained, Anatolian provides clear
> >evidence to distinguish between /e/, /e:/ and /eh1/.
> >===========
> >
> >No, M. Carrasquer Vidal,
> >
> >You have explained that
> >Hittite always has e: which
> >doesn't contrast with
> >never-attested *e
> >Anatolian does not support your theory.
> >It's neutral.
>
> And you're confusing Hittite and Anatolian again. Are you
> being deliberately stupid?
>
> ===========
>
> I'm summarizing what
> *you* have written
> You provided some scarce
> Hittite information
> and refused to explain
> Why pir and kir proved anything.
>
> Don't blame me because
> you failed to do something.
>
> Arnaud
>
> =============
>
> Well, your ignorance of the IE data is so abysmal, that your
> opinion on the matter is of no value.
>
> I'll stop wasting my time.
>
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> =======================
>
> The issue is not settled
> Any time you pop up with
> your defunct fancy
> You'll get your share again.
>
> As regards abysmal ignorance
> and shameful absurdities,
>
> Let me remind you
> That your absurd theory
> Claims that inherited *yekwr
> and the Germanic loanword
> *liposa > *libaro:
> prove a allophony !!
> in pre-PIE
>
> Ludicrous.
> Cf. Message 55450
>
> Don't be too condescendent
>
> I think competent people can see
> what's going on
> And you are the one
> who is laughable.
>
> M Carrasquer Vidal
> The man who invented an allophony
> in pre-PIE on the basis of a loanword
>
> Ha Ha Ha !
>
> It's going to make a hit
> in linguistic circles.
>
> Maybe you are better
> at cooking turbot ?
>
> Arnaud
>
> ===============
>
>
>
>