From: tgpedersen
Message: 55474
Date: 2008-03-18
>The whole thing looks more defensive to me, Jung tells that the Romans
> Interesting points. Didn't realize the Romans were
> still pushing aggressively that late.
> When was theAccording to this
> "Wetterau limes" finally abandoned? I suppose already
> by the time of Marcus SAurelius.
> > > > > GK: Is the implication that Przeworsk here wasYou and me both. They all get strangely fluffy around the subject.
> > > > > also a victim of the Roman pushes?
> > > >
> > > > I don't think so. The Roman colonization campaigns
> > > > and later punitive expeditions did not cross the Elbe, AFAIK
> > >
> > > GK: Sorry. I did not mean the "mother Przeworsk"
> > > east of the Oder, but the "intrusive Przeworsk" in
> > > West Thuringia and in the Wetterau.
> >
> > That occurred to me later.
> >
> > You're not gonna believe this:
> > I remembered vaguely that read that one of the camps of Drusus's
> > expedition was placed in the Wetterau, which would at least partly
> > answer your question./etc./
>
> ****GK: Perhaps wholly re the Wetterau Przeworsk.
> Hachmann argued that signs of the "intrusion" were
> archaeologically gone before the end of the 1rst c.
> BCE Which fits in well with the Drusus campaigns.****
>
> I'm still not too clear as to the narrower area where
> Hachmann and Kossack discern the earliest archaeology
> of the Elbe-Germanic culture.