From: george knysh
Message: 55461
Date: 2008-03-18
>****GK: The Bohemian extension would seem to fit in
>
> > > Archäologisches zur frühgermanischen Besiedlung
> > > zwischen Main und
> > > Nordsee, pp. 103-104
> > > in Kossack, Hachmann, Kuhn:
> > > Völker zwischen Germanen und Kelten
> > >
> > > "
> > > CONCLUSIONS
> > > The events in western North Germany must have
> taken a different
> > > course. A uniform, all-extensive movement can
> hardly be assumed
> > > here, nor can exclusively an
> Elbe-Germanic/Suebian
> > > population as carrier of these enterprises.
> >
> > GK: Does Kossack agree with Hachmann that
> "Early
> > Germanic" culture(=Elbe-Germanic?) spread into the
> old
> > Jastorf area from a point further south in the
> last
> > half of the 1rst c.BCE? Or did it spread there at
> the
> > same time as in "western North Germany", viz.,
> from
> > ca. 0-> CE?
>
> It's very odd. He asserts that the culture in
> Bohemia which appears
> abruptly in Bohemia, is strongly related to the
> continously developed
> culture on the Lower Elbe, and that the Germanic
> layer appears
> abruptly in Thuringia, but nowhere does he state
> that the influence
> went physically one way or the other. It would be
> logically possible
> that new features which changed Jastorf to
> Elbe-Germani came from the
> new elewment in Thuringia. He doesn't mention the
> Przeworsk/Oder-Warthe character of the new layer in
> Thuringia and
> Wetterau at all. Would it a problem for him to fit
> that in?
> > GK: Is the implication that Przeworsk here was****GK: Sorry. I did not mean the "mother Przeworsk"
> > also a victim of the Roman pushes?
>
> I don't think so. The Roman colonization campaigns
> and later punitive
> expeditions did not cross the Elbe, AFAIK
>____________________________________________________________________________________
> Torsten
>
>
>