Re: Latin -idus as from dH- too

From: Rick McCallister
Message: 55407
Date: 2008-03-17

My point is that word first meant "female" --i.e. a
grown daughter or a daughter who would be married and
nurse her children

--- "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
wrote:

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Rick McCallister
> To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 7:23 PM
> Subject: Re: Re: Re: [tied] Latin -idus as from dH-
> too
>
>
> because the word basically mean "female" --i.e. "one
> who gives suck"
> I think Watkins explains that --and doesn't female
> come from the same root?
> Now that we have fathers and daughters --what is the
> meaning of the root of brother?
>
> =========
>
> (Young) daughters precisely are not women
> and even less child-bearing mothers.
> so your explanation falls outside the target.
>
> Brother *bhreH2-ter looks like
> born child : bh_r + H2_t + er
> Maybe just a coincidence.
>
> Arnaud
> =============
>
>
>
>
>
>



____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ