Re: Latin -idus as from dH- too

----- Original Message -----
From: Patrick Ryan
To: cybalist@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 3:06 PM
Subject: [Courrier indésirable] Re: Re: Re: [tied] Latin -idus as from dH-
too


My, what a modern young man you are!

Up until recently, boys and girls had different functions and work
assignments in the household.

You think 'father' is going to get up early to milk the cows if he has an
'indentured' relative to do it?

All the nuclear family member names are functional: father - protector;
mother - nurser; daughter - milker, etc.

Why else would they all have habitual suffixes: -*te/or?

If you want the explanation for 'brother', research it in the Cybalist
files.

Patrick
================

From what you have already written
I understood you are some kind of a
socially, sexually and racially back-ward looking
conservative (frustrated) white male.

I don't buy your theory about family.
Mother *me?ter is most probably
the "birth-deliverer"
Father is only neurotically the protector,
Concretely it's either the f*r of the mother
or it's nothing.
I even less buy your theory about daughters.

Arnaud
=====================