Re: Re[2]: [tied] Latin -idus as from dH- too

On Sun, 16 Mar 2008 09:27:34 -0500, "Patrick Ryan"
<proto-language@...> wrote:

>I think Olsen is wrong; and I find her proposal that *Ht -> *tH then *th
>implausible; even further from reality is her idea that *th could be
>confused or conflated with *dh.

Only in Italic (simplifying: dh/th > þ > f), Greek (dh > th)
and Slavic (at least in the sequence -thlo- > -d(h)lo-). In
Sanskrit, Armenian, Germanic *th is /th/ (i.e. th, t`, þ).

=======================
Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
miguelc@...