Re: Latin -idus as from dH- too

From: alexandru_mg3
Message: 55223
Date: 2008-03-15

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:
>
> On 2008-03-15 17:37, Brian M. Scott wrote:
>
> > At 11:44:10 AM on Saturday, March 15, 2008, alexandru_mg3
> > wrote:
>
> > > 1. Do you have other syllabification for ph2ter but
> > > /pVX-ter/ (something like p&x-ter) Piotr?
> >
> > Sure: something like [pa"te:r], where [a"] is turned-a,
> > from an earlier stage that could have been something like
> > [pXte:r], possibly with some sort of prop vowel.
> >
> > Brian
>
> Not to mention the fact that there are languages with all kinds of
> voiceless, breathy-voiced (murmured) or pharyngealised vowels, and
that
> true syllabic fricatives (or "fricative vowels") are also attested.
>
> Piotr

... and there are the monkey's languages too (see BBC Science
these days) and the bird's languages too that are quite different too

Bravo Piotr! Good Argumentation!

Could I ask now directly to the topic?

Why you don't want to post the syllables of ph2ter and dHugh2ter
when you are knowing 'so well' the nature of laryngeals?

Marius

Previous in thread: 55222
Next in thread: 55224
Previous message: 55222
Next message: 55224

Contemporaneous posts     Posts in thread     all posts