Re[2]: [tied] Latin -idus as from dH- too

From: Brian M. Scott
Message: 55217
Date: 2008-03-15

At 11:44:10 AM on Saturday, March 15, 2008, alexandru_mg3
wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski
> <gpiotr@...> wrote:

>> On 2008-03-15 16:25, Brian M. Scott wrote:

>>> You're claiming native-speaker intuition for PIE?

>> While denying it to native speakers of English, Polish,
>> Spanish, Danish etc. ;)?


> I do not deny of course if you read again what I wrote I
> talked about ALL the indo-europeans

You wrote:

but as a native speaker of an Indo-European idiom I can
tell you that this is the case here:

/dHu-g&x-ter/
/p&x-ter/

It seems that several native speakers of IE idioms don't
share your view.

> 1. Do you have other syllabification for ph2ter but
> /pVX-ter/ (something like p&x-ter) Piotr?

Sure: something like [pa"te:r], where [a"] is turned-a,
from an earlier stage that could have been something like
[pXte:r], possibly with some sort of prop vowel.

Brian