Re: Latin -idus as from dH- too

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "alexandru_mg3" <alexandru_mg3@...>
wrote:

>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@> wrote:
> >
> > On 2008-03-15 15:01, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
> >
> > > I need to add that dHugh2te'r itself HAVING a VOCALIZED
> > > LARYNGEAL SHOWS THE ASPIRATION OF g > gh but NOT the pre-
> aspiration
> > > of -t-
> >
> > This particular type of aspiration by *h2 is Indo-Iranian and not
> PIE
> > (Ved. duhitá: but Gk. tHugáte:r). The pre-Indo-Aryan phonetic
> > realisation of interconsonantal *h2 must have been something like

*

> [hI],
> > since the initial syllable may "make a position" (i.e. scan as
> heavy) in
> > the RV (*dHug,hI,tá:(r) -- the commas indicate syllable
> boundaries).
> > Similarly, we have pr.tHiví: < *pr.t,hI,wíh < *pl.th2w-íh2 (but

Gk.

> > platús), etc. Your paradoxes result from confusing PIE phonetic
> > processes with branch-specific ones.
> >
> > Piotr
>
> Really, Piotr?
>
> Before to talk who confuse what : YOU NEED TO post first HERE the
> syllabification of dHugh2te'r ....and you will see who is wrong.
>
> Marius
>
>
> P>S> But at least pLEASE Don't start with a LATER and BEFORE
> VOCALISATION OF LARYNGEALS....:)
>

...and don't confused the re-shaped of syllabification made by Skt.
with the original PIE one

Marius