Re: Latin -idus as from dH- too

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Piotr Gasiorowski <gpiotr@...> wrote:

>
> On 2008-03-15 15:01, alexandru_mg3 wrote:
>
> > I need to add that dHugh2te'r itself HAVING a VOCALIZED
> > LARYNGEAL SHOWS THE ASPIRATION OF g > gh but NOT the pre-

aspiration

> > of -t-
>
> This particular type of aspiration by *h2 is Indo-Iranian and not

PIE

> (Ved. duhitá: but Gk. tHugáte:r). The pre-Indo-Aryan phonetic
> realisation of interconsonantal *h2 must have been something like *

[hI],

> since the initial syllable may "make a position" (i.e. scan as

heavy) in

> the RV (*dHug,hI,tá:(r) -- the commas indicate syllable

boundaries).

> Similarly, we have pr.tHiví: < *pr.t,hI,wíh < *pl.th2w-íh2 (but Gk.
> platús), etc. Your paradoxes result from confusing PIE phonetic
> processes with branch-specific ones.
>
> Piotr

Really, Piotr?

Before to talk who confuse what : YOU NEED TO post first HERE the
syllabification of dHugh2te'r ....and you will see who is wrong.

Marius


P>S> But at least pLEASE Don't start with a LATER and BEFORE
VOCALISATION OF LARYNGEALS....:)