From: Rick McCallister
Message: 55096
Date: 2008-03-13
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:42:14 +0100, "fournet.arnaud"____________________________________________________________________________________
> <fournet.arnaud@...> wrote:
>
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> >>Bomhard: Indo-European and the Nostratic
> hypothesis
> >>"
> >>344.
> >>PN *k'wad-/*k'w&d- "to form, to fashion, to build"
> >
> >>PK *k'wed- "to build", *k'wedel- "wall";
> >>PAA *k'wad-/*k'w&d- "to form, to fashion, to
> build";
> >>PD *kut.i "house, hut, abode"
> >>
> >>Est. kodu, - "home"
> >>
> >>Cf. German Kotte, Eng cot, cottage
> >>
> >>which could also be reconstructed from this word
> family.
> >>===========
> >
> >Klimov reconstructs PGZ *k.(e)d-el- "wall". Svan
> c^.wed-
> >with the same meaning shows an irregular
> correspondence k.-
> >~ c^.w-.
> >
> >======
> >It's also interesting to look at Starostin
> >He has two different reconstructions.
>
> Starostin has *k.ad- "to build", basically the same
> as
> Klimov's *k.ed-/*k.d- "to build" (on Laz k.id- ~
> k.od-,
> Klimov remarks that "the last form must point to a
> parallel
> vocalism *a").
>
> =======================
> Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
> miguelc@...
>
>