Re: Post-Postscript on Przeworsk

From: tgpedersen
Message: 55031
Date: 2008-03-11

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
wrote:
>
> From: tgpedersen
>
> >
> > ****GK: The Lugian/Vandilic group was. From the start
> > and to the end of Przeworsk. The saga of the Vandals...****
>
> http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/cybalist/message/49777
> Connection to the Limfjord, Cimbri, Teutones etc.
>
> =================
>
> Have you noticed how much
> Germanic
> Got and Geat look like
> Yenissei
> Kott and Ket ?

As a matter of fact, no, I haven't. Do you also have proposals for the
Germanic counterparts for Arin, Assan, Yugh and Pumpokol?

> Fascinating.

Yes.

> Arnaud
> ================
> >
> > ****GK: Przeworsk did not annihilate the cultures of
> > Western Germania when it mingled with them. What's
> > your evidence that it is the carriers of Przeworsk who
> > developed a written language and literature? The
> > Vandals didn't.****
>
> We know that the leader of the Przeworsk expansion at the time
> developed it personally. Don't you read your sources?
> Torsten
>
> ===========
> Torsten,
>
> What are your reasons to reject
> the supposed indications that
> Jastorf expanded east and south-east ?

I don't.

> Or
> does it mean you think
> this is irrelevant as regards Germanic ?

No, it represents one of the ancestors of Germanic coming on to the stage.


Torsten