Re: Post-Postscript on Przeworsk

From: george knysh
Message: 55021
Date: 2008-03-11

--- "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
wrote:

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: george knysh
>
> ****GK: Fine. Then explain why
>
> (1) Jastorf+Silesian Celts+Bornholm and other
> islanders+ Pomeranians (=Przeworsk) creates
> "Germanic", WHILE
>
> (2) Jastorf+ Pomeranians+ Scandinavians (=Oksywie)
> DOES NOT, and
>
> (3) Jastorf+ Pomeranians+ Milohrad c.+ Scythian
> Thrakoids (=Zarubintsi) DOES NOT, and
>
> (4) Jastorf+ Pomeranians + Geto/Dacian c. (=
> Poeneshti-Lukashovka) DOES NOT.
>
> ****
> >
> ===========
> Mr. Knysh
>
> Does this mean you consider
> Jastorf cannot be the homeland of Germanic ?
>
> Arnaud
> ===============

****GK: I only claim that Jastorf was Germanic before
it spread towards the east and southeast, not
necessarily that it was the "homeland" of
Germanic.****
>
>
>
>
>



____________________________________________________________________________________
Looking for last minute shopping deals?
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping