From: Rick McCallister
Message: 54934
Date: 2008-03-09
> I am glad to finally be able to provide a veryhttp://geocities.com/proto-language/PL-Monosyllables_short.htm
> interesting link to our
> group:
>
>
> http://www.uaf.edu/anlc/docs/vajda-2008.pdf
>
>
> Vajda has made an absolutely brilliant analysis of
> the _now_ certain
> relationship between Siberian Yeneseian and North
> American Na-Dene.
>
> His statement on the proper way to compare language
> families is a classic
> formulation of all the right principles, in my
> opinion. And he applies them
> competently to the hypothesis at hand.
>
> It is particularly exciting to me that he has
> identified several morphemes
> that can be easily connected with my Proto-Language
> monosyllables, the short
> listing of which is at
>
>
>____________________________________________________________________________________
>
> It is a validation of the universality of those
> monosyllables.
>
> Some readers may want to compare the meanings of the
> morphemes he has
> identified with the following PL monosyllables:
>
> PL T?SA with YeNa <d>
> PL NHA with YeNa <l> and possibly <tl>
> PL NA with YeNa <n>
> PL QO with YeNa final <ng>
> PL FO with YeNa <w> (2nd p. sing.)
> PL ¿E with YeNa <i> (1st p. sing.)
> PL NO with YeNa <n> (1st. p.)
> PL P?A with YeNa <b> (inanimate)
>
> and others with the connection is less obvious.
>
> I can hardly wait for a Proto-Yeneseian Dictionary.
>
>
> Patrick
>
>