From: Patrick Ryan
Message: 54717
Date: 2008-03-06
----- Original Message -----
From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 3:27 AM
Subject: Re: [tied] Re: Swiftness of Indra
>
> 1) Alexander Lubotsky's suggestion that *indra does not conform to
> the expected Indo-Iranian vocalization, and may, therefore, be a non-
> IE word;
> ==========
> It's absurd to start with the wrong root
> and then declare the word must be a loanword
> because the wrong root does not provide the expected result....
> A.
> ==============
> 3) John Colarusso's speculation that Indra may represent an early
> North-West Caucasian loan into IE -- cf. Circassian /y@.../ 'huge +
> present participle', Abkhaz /á-yna-r/ 'the huge + present
> participle', the name of the god of the forge Aynar ('the Huge One')
> > *inra > *indra (with intrusive -d-), in this case originally
> meaning 'the Great One'.
> =============
> Considering the fact that Indra belongs to
> the Second class of tripartite ideology : warriors.
>
> I suggest *?int?ara is PIE :
> ?i "the one who"
> n- "is not"
> t?ar "true, righteous, orderly"
>
> PIE *d_r- true has #t?- as initial.
>
> Burns temples, kills cattle, etc
>
> Arnaud.
> =============
> Here is the link to the page from a book by Colarusso where this
> etymology is discussed (N.B. Colarusso theorizes that North-West
> Caucasian languages may be genetically related to the IE family in a
> larger "Pontic" family):
>
> http://tinyurl.com/357ype
>
> ==========
> This pontic = PIE family looks really nice !!
> I agree with Colarusso.
> A.
> =============
>
>
>