From: Rick McCallister
Message: 54699
Date: 2008-03-06
>Not true: See Jehovah, Yahweh, Allah et al. In
> The only objections I would raise would be:
>
> 1) it is rather unusual to borrow a name for the
> supreme god;
>____________________________________________________________________________________
> 2) forges are not usually associated with
> sky/weather gods.
>
>
> Patrick
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Francesco Brighenti" <frabrig@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 5:27 PM
> Subject: [tied] Re: Swiftness of Indra
>
>
>
> George Knysh:
>
> > I was ready to accept the notion that Indra was a
> later borrowing
> > on the authority of Lubotsky and Witzel, even as I
> was rejecting
> > some of their broader contentions about rituals.
>
> Joao S. Lopes:
>
> > But this epenthetical -d- is possible if the word
> is not IE.
> > Indra < *Inra ?
>
>
> May I jump in here with some additional data and
> hypotheses?
>
> Don't take me too seriously (I'm thinking of this
> idea for the first
> time right now), but, if the word Indra is not IE,
> it could belong
> to a hypothetical Macro-Caucasian substrate language
> of Central
> Asia.
>
> This conjecture of mine rests upon:
>
> 1) Alexander Lubotsky's suggestion that *indra does
> not conform to
> the expected Indo-Iranian vocalization, and may,
> therefore, be a non-
> IE word;
>
> 2) Michael Witzel's theory according to which the
> "Central Asian
> substrate words" found by Lubotsky in Indo-Iranian
> would have been
> borrowed by one or more Macro-Caucasian language(s)
> spoken by the
> peoples of the Bactria-Margiana Archaeological
> Complex (BMAC);
>
> 3) John Colarusso's speculation that Indra may
> represent an early
> North-West Caucasian loan into IE -- cf. Circassian
> /y@.../ 'huge +
> present participle', Abkhaz /á-yna-r/ 'the huge +
> present
> participle', the name of the god of the forge Aynar
> ('the Huge One')
> > *inra > *indra (with intrusive -d-), in this case
> originally
> meaning 'the Great One'.
>
> Here is the link to the page from a book by
> Colarusso where this
> etymology is discussed (N.B. Colarusso theorizes
> that North-West
> Caucasian languages may be genetically related to
> the IE family in a
> larger "Pontic" family):
>
> http://tinyurl.com/357ype
>
> ==========
>
> Addenda:
>
> M. Witzel, "The Rgvedic Religious System and Its
> Central Asian and
> Hindukush Antecedents", in A. Griffiths & J.E.M.
> Houben (eds.), _The
> Vedas: Texts, Language and Ritual_, Groningen,
> Forsten, 2004
> (preprint pdf):
>
> "One may therefore revisit the old etymology of
> Indra from ind 'to
> swell'. [M. Mayrhofer's] EWAia... connects indra
> with the
> meaning 'strong': índra or *indrá 'strong, strength'
> ~ Gr. oidéo: 'to
> swell' and perhaps índu 'drop'; if this goes back to
> *(h)i-n-d-ro ~
> Slav. *je,dr' 'strong, forceful' (Croat. jédar
> 'strong', O.Russ.
> jadr' 'quick')..."
>
> And, from another (2002) preprint pdf by Witzel
> ("Early Loan Words
> in Western Central Asia: Substrates, Migrations and
> Trade"):
>
> "[An] interesting river name is that of the Indra
> River in S.
> Tajikistan, Indar-a:b, and the Inder lake (Russ.
> ozero Inder) on the
> lower Ural river in W. Kazakhstan. In light of the
> proposed non-IIr
> etymology of the name of the god Indra... these
> widespread names may
> reflect the C. Asian substrate language as well.
> Much more research
> is needed, however, to turn these proposals into
> something closer to
> certainty."
>
> Regards,
> Francesco
>
>