Re: Early Indo-European loanwords preserved in Finnish

That seems to be the consensus at the moment as Piotr spelled out helpfully.

Why fight it?


Patrick

----- Original Message -----
From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2008 3:55 PM
Subject: Re: Re: [tied] Early Indo-European loanwords preserved in Finnish


>
> You were the one to question whether Ham(itic) was appropriate.
>
> Omotic and non-Omotic works as well as any.
>
> Perhaps Central Indo-European?
>
> Who really cares?
>
> Patrick
>
> ==============
>
> I'm not convinced at all
> that Omotic deserves to be part of PAA
> in the first place.
>
> Arnaud
>
> ==========
>
>