From: Rick McCallister
Message: 53839
Date: 2008-02-21
>____________________________________________________________________________________
> So, if Finnish is not Uralic, what is it? On the
> Wikipedia site they give a pretty convincing
> argument
> that it's related to Saami, Estonian, Hungarian et
> al.
> Is that a conspiracy?
>
> ============
>
> I miswrote what I meant.
>
> I meant Finnish features cannot be taken
> to be inherited from proto-Uralic.
> If Finnish has -i-
> it does not mean Proto-Uralic had it.
>
> Sorry for the obscurities.
>
> Finnish is obviously an Uralic language.
>
> Arnaud
>
> ============
>
>
>