Re: Burushaski

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "stlatos" <stlatos@...> wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Francesco Brighenti" <frabrig@>
> wrote:
>
> > All in all, nothing at the present stage of linguistic research
> > allows one to maintain that Burushahski "is obviously an Indo-
> > European language"!
>
> Well, I didn't mean obvious to a non-linguist, or one unfamiliar
> with Arm., but it's still very surprising to me.

With this you imply that the IE origin of Burushaski should appear
obvious to scholars. It's really strange that not one comparative
linguist and/or Indo-Aryan philologist has came to your same
conclusions so far. This means all those guys are but fake scholars.
ONLY YOU are the genuine scholar here.

FB