Re: Uralic Continuity Theory (was: Meaning of Aryan: now, "white peo

***Without naming any particular opponent on this forum***
I must say that
some of the argumentation regarding Proto-Uralic 10.000 years back
remind me immediately of this type of science.
Jouppe
=====
Who is going to believe you ?
Arnaud
=============

I think the moderator should rule out speculation on 'Sino-Tibeto-
Uralic' -type of constructions, which does not even involve Proto-
Indo-European, which is the subject of the forum. I think I saw a
rule against discussion of Nostratic in the rules of the forum.
Jouppe
=================
You look like the kind of
Finns who claim for autochthony in Finland.

Why don't you publish a rule
forbiding that cybalist can discuss any other
issue than OIT ?

To be frank,
you have disappointed me.
But I suspected something was wrong
from the start.
You send me nice private mails.
And then you threw harsh public mails.
I think I see clear now.

Arnaud
===================