Re: Can new Algor i thms reveal the

From: mkelkar2003
Message: 53524
Date: 2008-02-17

--- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "Richard Wordingham" <richard@...> wrote:
>
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@>
> wrote:
>
> Mayuresh Kelkar drew our attention to:
> http://www.hjholm.de/Holm%20Arbo%20old.pdf
>
> One of its figures is the following map:
>
> > The map is interesting :
> >
> > http://www.hjholm.de/SLRD-map.jpg
> >
> > You shot in your foot.
>
> No he didn't. Hans Holm's paper says that the history depicted there
> was not proven. Mayursh was principally sharing some graphics with
> us, not trying to make a point.


Holmes rejects or severly critizes the quantitative methods used by
Gray, McMahon, Ringe in the "Arboreteum" paper. His on SLR method does
not produce the first branch as Anatolian. The map shown below

http://www.hjholm.de/SLRD-map.jpg

is based on that premise. Here is the problem. The earliest
branching of Anatolian is I think unversally agreed upon by IEL. How
important is this to maintain a norhtern Caspian scenerio?

M. Kelkar
>
> Richard.
>