Re: Meaning of Aryan: now, "white people"?

This will definitely be my last post re Kelkar. The
man is an out and out liar. Cf.below at **!!!!**

--- mkelkar2003 <swatimkelkar@...> wrote:

> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, george knysh
> <gknysh@...> wrote:
> >
> >
> > --- mkelkar2003 <swatimkelkar@...> wrote:
> >
> > > Very scientific! Dixon's BULLSHIT! punctuality
> > > equilibrium model has
> > > been validated in a recent Science magazine
> article
> > > Evolution of language in punctual bursts."
> > >
> > > Every one who does not agree with you is "aged"
> > > (Dhavalikar), "compromised" and colored by
> > > "indiginist point of view"
> > > Not everyone who supports the OIT model is of
> South
> > > Asian origin.
> > >
> > > Lets continue this "scientific" dialgoue.
> > >
> > > M. Kelkar
> >
> > GK: The OIT has been effectively refuted time
> and
> > again in our archives. Kelkar has nothing new to
> > contribute and just keeps repeating himself,
> lapsing
> > into inconsequential comments such as the above
> > instead of dealing with arguments. A familiar
> tactic.
> > I, for one, will henceforth ignore him. But a
> thought
> > comes to mind. Why should someone like Kelkar have
> the
> > right to continue his crusades when Torsten was
> asked
> > to discontinue his Odinist fantasies? Is OIT less
> > annoying than Odinism? Or do we discriminate
> against
> > Danes (:=)))? Perhaps we could leave it to our
> > moderators to decide when and if Kelkar and his
> ilk
> > have something genuine to advance in favour of
> their
> > views? Why continue repeating ad nauseam e.g.
> messages
> > 43547ss. and many similar contexts?****
> >

KELKAR: **!!!!**

> I did reply to Klejin(?) article you posted earlier.
> It never
> made it through. S/he starts out withe assumption
> that Rig Veda
> records the colonization of India by invading
> "Aryans" and then tries
> to fit the archaeological data into it. The fact is
> Rig Veda does
> not record any such invasion.
>
> M. Kelkar

****GK: Here is what Kleijn stated:

"The R(i)gveda and other texts of the ancient Indian
religion reveal the gradual colonization of India by
the Aryans moving in a northwest to south-east
direction, but they do not give any indications of
their original homeland."

Nowhere does K. assert that the Rigveda "records" an
"Aryan" invasion. He says "reveals", and it is crystal
clear what he means by this (viz.,the presence in the
RV of elements which are verified in the
archaeological evidence of the Catacomb culture of
Eurasia (now dated ca. 2900-2200 BCE)and absent in the
pre-IE culture of India).****

>

______________________________________________________________________

> ______________
> > Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
> > http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> >
>
>
>

____________________________________________________________________________________
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs