From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
Message: 53056
Date: 2008-02-14
>No. The Balto-Slavic system is based on a system where most
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Miguel Carrasquer Vidal
>
>As I have mentioned here before, I think that Balto-Slavic
>had three basic accent paradigms instead of two, as is
>usually assumed. Besides the accent paradigm with fixed
>stress on the root (a.p. I, Lithuanian a.p. 1/2), and the
>accent paradigm with mobile stress alternating between
>initial and final position (a.p. III, Lithuanian a.p. 3/4),
>I believe there was also an accent paradigm (I call it a.p.
>II) with fixed stress on the thematic vowel. In the verbal
>system, this accentual type is abundant, comprising the
>large majority of verbs in -je-, -ne-, -de- and -i-, and a
>sizeable minority of the e-verbs.
>
>In the nominal system, however, only two categories belonged
>to type II: oxytone neuters in *-ó, and compound nouns with
>a stressed suffix like *-ikó- or *-otá:.
>==============
>It looks quite natural.
>So I would readily agree with this.
>
>Did this set of three paradigms exist in PIE too ?
>What is a.p. ?Yes.
>accent paradigm ?