Re: Evoluation and History of Human Populations in South Asia

Arnaud, no criticism intended but I think it is interesting psychologically
that you wrote

autochtonous

which, I will bet, it pretty close to how you pronounce it; but you know the
word is

autochthonous

I am sure.


Patrick

----- Original Message -----
From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 1:53 AM
Subject: Re: [tied] Evolution and History of Human Populations in South Asia


>
> From: Rick McCallister
>
> They're all to the right of Attila of the
> Hun and they all hate one another for not adhering to
> the one true faith. Now that's hate.
> I'm sure Kelkar's man Thackery and his fellow Hindutva
> jihadis would feel at home with the US taliban
>
> =================
> I think this kind of statements is extremely strong.
> If it's true,
> These guys just should not have access to cybalist.
> otherwise
> I suppose it's not adequate.
>
> Arnaud
> ===================
> --- Patrick Ryan <proto-language@...> wrote:
>
> The Out of India question is important to Indians;
> ==========
>
> I don't understand why it should be important.
>
> I'm happy being French,
> and I'm aware that French people are a mix
> of local prehistoric survivors plus a lot of immigrants
> and all these people speak a language (French)
> that was imported from outside and is mixed
> with lexical local fossils and a lot of loanwords.
>
> Where is the problem with not being autochtonous ?
> Who cares ?
>
> Arnaud
> =================
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>