Re: [Courrier indésirable] Re: [tied] Re: S mobile (Was : PS Emphat

Arnaud,

I tolerate your rudeness so I can vent my own spleen but to use "damn" to
Piotr, who has treated you with undeserved kindness, is outrageous!

Apologize or get off this list.


Patrick

----- Original Message -----
From: "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 6:16 AM
Subject: Re: [Courrier indésirable] Re: [tied] Re: S mobile (Was : PS
Emphatics)


> fournet.arnaud wrote:
>
> > Does it have a s- in the first place ? One just can explain #r- with
> > r- ? no need to presuppose sr-
>
> The *sr- in *sreu- is not "presupposed" but securely reconstructed on
> the basis of Skt. srávati, srutá, Germanic *stroumo-, Slavic *strumy,
> Lith. srau~jas, OIr. sruaim, sruth, etc.
>
> And, yes, rivers are often said to "run" in all languages I know.
>
> Piotr
> ==============
> And what about
> Celtic row-dh-anos > Rhone ?
> No need for this #sr- inception.
>
> Rava
> I'am waiting for your alternative explanation.
>
> Tchadic :
> ruwa "water".
> Chinese
> liu2 "to flow"
>
> We don't need to pre-suppose
> *sr- is the original form.
> Your reasoning is completely circular.
> Are you aware of that circularity ?
>
> You are *damn* wrong
> with your orthodox *sr- thing.
> It does not exist.
>
> Arnaud
> =================
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>