From: Piotr Gasiorowski
Message: 52673
Date: 2008-02-11
> You're arguing something like: "we know when and how the "rice" wordI didn't say that *rugHi- couldn't be a loan. But in order to argue that
> found its way into Germanic but not how its cousin for "rye" got into
> B.-S. and Germanic and therefore the rice word was loaned into
> Germanic and the "rye" word wasn't". This sounds like a parody, of
> course. Please point out where I'm mistaken.
>> and if the word got into Europe via the Iranian languages, why do weIt's supposed to be a Dravidian loan with an original _affricate_ for
>> have a reflex of *gH, not *g^H, in Balto-Slavic?).
>
> Who said 'Iranian'?
> It's not indigenous to Central and Eastern Europe.Well, neither are sheep, yet there are IE words for 'ewe', 'ram', 'lamb'
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rye
> They must have been experimenting all over the place to find new crop... Therefore, it seems that the domestication of rye in Europe was the
> grasses once they heard of the success of their neighbors.
>> I find it safer to assume, until proven otherwise, thatThat remains to be proved.
>> *rugHi-/*rugHjo- is a separate term.
>
> Separated, not separate.
> Denmark is ryebread country too. FWIW, some Danish nationalist writerYou mean typical Danish rugbrød? It's delicious, though white, crisp
> on Schleswig claimed there was an old 'taste barrier' between
> Schleswig and Holstein; we find their pumpernickel too coarse, they
> find our ryebread sickly sweet.