From: Rick McCallister
Message: 52626
Date: 2008-02-11
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, "fournet.arnaud"____________________________________________________________________________________
> <fournet.arnaud@...>
> wrote:
> >
> > So what ?
> >
> > Do you think you can find a trace
> > in the genes of black African people ?
> > accounting for the fact that most of them
> > speak either English or French ?
> > The invasion of a dominant ultra-thin layer
> > can impose its language.
> >
> > This study proves nothing
> > when it comes to Indo-Aryan languages
> > being invaders from outside.
> > This invasion is a fact,
> > not a kind of "working hypothesis".
> >
> > Denying that is absurd.
> >
> > Arnaud
>
> "This invasion is a fact,
> > not a kind of "working hypothesis"."
>
> A Fact must be based on objectively verifiable
> evidence. The only
> "evidence" you have is the hypothetically
> reconstructed PIE which is
> basically Greek phonology tagged on to Sansrkit
> vocabulary. Such a
> reconstruction is not sufficient to locate where and
> when this
> language may have been spoken. There are about
> seventy working
> hypotheses about that question (Mallory). The area
> NW India-Pakistan
> is definitely one of these working hypotheses.
>
> M. Kelkar
>
>
>
> > ====================
> >
>
>
>