From: Rick McCallister
Message: 52498
Date: 2008-02-07
> Yes, well where did you see that 90% of Japanese____________________________________________________________________________________
> words are non-native?
>
> Patrick
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Rick McCallister" <gabaroo6958@...>
> To: <cybalist@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 4:35 PM
> Subject: Re:Re: [tied] Languages Evolve in
> Punctuational Bursts
>
>
> > I have seen a wide range given for native Japanese
> > words --between 10% and 50%. I read somewhere
> about
> > 200-400 words.
> > Despite claims of an Austronesian substrate, I've
> seen
> > about 4 or 5 Japanese words attributed to
> > Austronesian, although I wouldn't be surprised if
> > there were more.
> > Sasha Vovin, I believe, postulated a link between
> Ainu
> > and Austro-Asiatic, which would be the source for
> > Austro-Asiatic.
> >
> > --- "fournet.arnaud" <fournet.arnaud@...>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I have expressed an interest in learning more
> about
> > > the idea that a majority
> > > of words in Japanese are from any other
> language.
> > > I asked for the source of your pronouncement
> unless,
> > > of course, you are an
> > > expert on Japanese yourself.
> > > Patrick
> > > ================
> > > There are very few "japanese" words.
> > >
> > > Words that are neither Chinese, nor Dutch, nor
> > > Portuguese,
> > > are few
> > > and many of these words are from Austro-asiatic
> > > like hara "belly" from *parat,
> > >
> > > In the end, when loanwords are cleared,
> > > Japanese has about as many inherited words
> > > as Albanese.
> > >
> > > Arnaud
> > > ============
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> > Be a better friend, newshound, andhttp://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
> > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
> >
>
> >____________________________________________________________________________________
> >
>