From: Rick McCallister
Message: 52070
Date: 2008-01-29
> --- In cybalist@yahoogroups.com, Rick McCallister____________________________________________________________________________________
> <gabaroo6958@...> wrote:
> >
> > Clicks are certainly limited but since they exists
> as
> > phonemes, they need to be taken into account.
> > AFAIK -some of the Khoi-San langauges have the
> > greatest number of phonemes of any language, so
> they
> > weren't challenged for sounds, like say Hawaiian.
> > Besides the South African Sprachbund, Sandawe and
> > Hadza, there is supposedly a Cushitic language
> that
> > has clicks and they are used in some Australian
> > language for some specialized purpose (men's
> > language?).
> > Are they related to ingressives or ejectives
> somehow?
> > Besides clicks, what are the other "strange"
> phonemes
> > or phonetic systems?
> > Dravidian and Australian have lack of voiced and
> > aspirates but fine distinctions between
> articulation
> > points. Is this limited to those 2 groups?
>
> > English /T/ is a rare enough sound --AFAIK only
> found
> > in Europe in English, Icelandic, Faeroese, N.
> Spanish,
> > Albananian and Greek; in Asia in Burmese,
> Classical
> > Arabic; in the Americas in Shawnee and I don't
> know
> > where else.
>
> Also in yr iaith Gymraeg (Welsh), in several Central
> and Northern Tai
> dialects (where it derives from Proto-Tai *s and
> *z), and as an
> alternative to the lateral fricative in Choctaw.
> (Several of the Tai
> languages have this latter alternation - it is an
> areal tendency of
> Southern China.) Also, it is far from unknown for
> /th/ to have [T] as
> an allophone.
>
> A fleeting existence is also not unknown - it is
> argued for
> 'Proto-Italic' and an earlier stage of Armenian, and
> it was once more
> widespread in the Semitic languages - Massoretic
> Hebrew has /T/, which
> goes back to Proto-Semitic *t. (The phonemic status
> was incipient.)
>
> Richard.
>
>